The @orgdevkit/kit-feedback round machine's surfaces, in the order a person meets them: M4, where a round is finished — one decision about dozens of lines, so the screen counts what is in the round per author and states, before the button, exactly what pressing it will make visible and to whom — M4a, the one conversation that settles what the round means before the research team spends anything on it, M5, the thread system as the member reads it, and R5, the same threads as somebody they invited reads them. Over one synthetic round about a shared workspace: no database, no model, nothing published anywhere.
What is true about this round
Every figure on the screen comes from wrapUp() and none is computed in the component — the amber block is the last thing read before words reach other people, so a count assembled in a surface is a count that can disagree with the handover that follows it. The switches change the DATA; the screen only ever prints what it was handed.
Finishing does two things: it gathers everything this round added into one conversation, and after that into one research direction. Nothing travels there on its own.
What this round holds · counted per author
You · at a point6reactions · 3 to everyone, 2 to one person, 1 kept in your own thread
You · about the whole plan1comments that do not sit at one point
Jo · facilities1each one on a passage they quoted
Sam · the floor above1written about points in your plan
● What becomes visible when you finish
Your 4 reactions become visible to the people you addressed them to: 3 to everyone, 1 to one person. That is 2 people. One of them is about the plan as a whole, and appears under your name with no single point beside it. Your one note without a recipient stays private. 1 of what you wrote is addressed to a name that is linked to nobody here, so nothing is sent — and nothing was. Part of this round was handed over earlier. What reached people then stays with them; this changes nothing about it.
How your plan is arranged · the assistant’s proposalNothing applies itself
the assistant · checked · your reactions up to round 3 · the chapters as version 3 lists themYou react most where the sources disagree, and you keep naming what you notice yourself as a separate line. I would call the first chapter what you call it in your reactions, pull what you notice yourself up next to it, and say plainly that the disagreements are between the sources. The points stay exactly where they are. Only the names and the order change.
✳Proposal · not applied
What the sources say→The evidenceshorter, and it is what you call it in your reactions
What you notice yourselfmovedyou read it right after the evidence, every round
Where they disagree→Where the sources disagreemoved“they” was the sources, and it did not read that way
Before you read ona page of your ownyou asked twice where to put something that is not about one point
This does not touch the points themselves, their text, how strongly they are graded, or any of the reactions you wrote.3 chapters are not mentioned here, and stay exactly where they are under their own names.
The chapter list this produces
The rail the reader would draw, from structureRail() — the same resolver the panel measures its own claims with. A proposal only overlays anything while it is active, and every chapter it does not mention is still here, appended under the plan's own name. That is what makes it safe to let an assistant draw a chapter list at all: it can rename and re-order, and it cannot make part of somebody's plan unreachable.
What the sources say
Where they disagree
What you notice yourself
What nobody has measured
What to try first
Questions for your next appointment
M4a — the one conversation the round gets
Once the round is handed over, one conversation settles what it means before the research team spends anything on it. It opens on an agenda that was prepared, not authored: the list names only what needs this person's judgement, and what passes through is derived from the round's own count — so no writer and no screen writes a total down, and the agenda cannot make a reaction disappear. The fixture agenda names one thread twice and one thread from another round entirely; both are ordinary things to prepare, and neither moves a figure.
6 of 9 pass through · 3 on the table · 2 turn(s) · nothing to send
Round 3 · one conversation about the whole stack
Before this goes to the research
What the assistant sees herethe 6 reactions in this round, one comment about the plan as a whole, the 2 comments written back to you, and the library. Not: your documents, your lab results, or anything from another round.
The agenda · prepared in advanceThe research team read everything in this round once, in full, before this.
66 of the 9 are clear and go through exactly as they stand
33 are on the table; your judgement is only needed there
1Your two reactions about the quiet hours point different ways: one is about the morning, the other about the whole day.
2Jo’s question about the rota, and whether it should be answered before the panels are ordered.
3Your reservation about the quiet hours: whether to carry it into the next round as a question.
And one smaller item; it comes up on its own in the conversation.
What is clear is not asked again here. This conversation is only about these, and about proposals for how the plan is arranged.
We keep this conversation and use it to improve the product as a whole.
the assistant · checkedYou marked the quiet hours four times, and Jo asked about the rota that sits next to them. I would make one research direction of that. Is it right that this is about how the day runs, rather than about the desks themselves?
Yes. The desks are fine. It is the middle of the afternoon that falls apart.
Finishing starts the work: the research team uses the coming days’ budget until the whole stack is in the plan in one go. Reading and reacting carry on as normal in the meantime; questions to the assistant come back after that.
This conversation is saved after every turn, on every device. You can walk away from it without finishing anything: your home screen says at the top that it is open, with the last turn beside it, and that is where you pick it up. The work only starts when you finish it yourself.
M5 — feedback and replies, the one thread system
The same threads M4 counted, read from the member's own side: what the people they invited wrote, what the member asked, and the replies both ways. Every thread lands in exactly one of five states, and the two counted sentences — the header and the line at the foot saying what travels to the next round — are that one partition read twice, so they cannot disagree. The fixture carries the three ordinary rows that would each move a figure: a disposition stamped with no outcome (a time is not an outcome), a thread carrying both an exit and a removal (taking a row off a list cannot recall what already happened), and a row belonging to Jo rather than to the member (dispositions are per viewer, which is the whole reason the table exists).
Three things this tab does not fake. The filter is the host's, because it is the URL. The assistant's sentences inside process are a model call, so the exits are drawn and the words are not invented. And nothing applies itself: settling a thread takes a chosen exit and a confirmation naming the round after this one.
3 waiting (1 new) · 3 settled · 1 removed · 7 on the list · 2 reached nobody · 3 shown · live
Round 3 · you and the people you invited
Feedback and replies
Everything you and the people you invited wrote each other, in one place: their comments on the plan, their answers to your questions, and your replies back. Per thread you choose: answer it, process it into the plan through a short conversation, or take it off your list. What somebody wrote stays there word for word.
3 threads are waiting on you, one of them with a new answer. 3 are settled, and one you took off this list.
From whom
About what
Status
●new answerJo · facilitiesA rota for the window desks
you wroteWould a rota make the afternoons workable, or only move the problem to whoever is on it?
Jo · facilities wrote · kept word for wordIt moves it, unless the quiet hours hold at the same time. On their own, a rota is a way of taking turns being interrupted.
Processing goes through a short conversation and puts nothing in the plan by itself. Answering keeps the thread open. Removing takes it off your list only; nothing changes for Jo · facilities.
◌waiting on youJo · facilitiesA rota for the window desks
the window desks are first-come
Jo · facilities wrote · kept word for wordThe window desks were first-come long before the rota was written down. Changing that is a bigger decision than it looks from the plan.
Processing goes through a short conversation and puts nothing in the plan by itself. Answering keeps the thread open. Removing takes it off your list only; nothing changes for Jo · facilities.
↩answered · stays openSam · the floor aboveAbsorbing panels above the long desks
Sam · the floor above wrote · kept word for wordThe panels were measured in the reference room, not above the long desks. Those are not the same room.
you wroteYou are right. I will ask for the measurement to be repeated where the desks actually are.
Processing goes through a short conversation and puts nothing in the plan by itself. Answering keeps the thread open. Removing takes it off your list only; nothing changes for Sam · the floor above.
What of this travels to the next roundOf what you settled, one became a question for round 4, one stands as a caveat at its point, one travels on in your own words, word for word. 3 threads you have not processed; they travel exactly as they are, and not processing is an outcome too. What you removed goes nowhere.Nobody gets a counter and nobody gets a read receipt. If you answer someone, your reply stands at the top of their own feedback page and they see it when they look; nothing is mailed. Removing stays with you; the other side notices nothing.2 threads of this round are not here: they reached nobody — kept in your own thread, or addressed to names that are linked to no account. They are in the plan where you wrote them.
R5 — the same threads, read by somebody who was invited
One thread system, the other side of it. What a reader is owed is not what a member is owed, so almost nothing on this screen is the screen above with different words: the block at the top is the notice (what somebody said after you did, with the verb that answers it) and the list under it is the record (your own words, and what became of them). The same fixture round, read as Jo.
Three things this screen refuses, and each one is a sentence it could otherwise print untruthfully. It does not count what it drops: a thread of another reader that never reached you is gone without a figure, because a number for it is exactly the hint whether anyone else is reading you cannot see here forbids. It does not turn an absence into a pending state: a comment nobody settled says it stands where you wrote it, which is also all the door behind it knows. And it never prints the temporary refusal over a permanent one — switch the round to history and sharing off together, and the sentence where the change verb stood is the round's, because the pause's promise that it comes back is one a closed round cannot keep.
6 on the page · 4 yours · 2 addressed to you · 3 new · 3 settled · 6 shown · live
Round 3 · still open
Feedback and replies
Your notes and questions, what this person asked you, and what became of your words. What other readers wrote is not here, and whether anyone else is reading along you cannot see from this page. While this round is open you can change your own words; after that they stay as they are.
New for you3 are waiting for you
●this person repliedA rota for the window desks
under your own noteThe window desks were first-come long before anybody wrote a rota down. Changing that is a bigger decision than the plan makes it look, and it is worth saying so out loud.
That is fair. Would you keep the rota at all, or drop it and hold the quiet hours instead?
●the assistant wroteMove the calls to the small room
under your own noteThe small room has one power socket and no window. Nobody takes an hour-long call in there twice.
Noted at the point. The plan says the room is free, and this says it is unusable for the thing it would be freed for; those are different claims and the second is not measured.
●this person asked youA rota for the window desks
You know the floor best: would a rota survive a week in practice, or is it a paper fix?
This block is the notice. If nothing is here, there is nothing for you. Nothing is mailed, so this page is where you find out — it waits here until you look.
addressed to youTwo fixed quiet hours a day
Two hours, but not back to back — nobody can hold four.
somebody else this was addressed to wroteFour back to back is what we have now, and it is why the afternoon is a write-off.
you wroteTwo, and not adjacent. Split them by the lunch hour and the afternoon has a chance.
✓went on as a questionnoteA rota for the window desksedited
the window desks are first-come
The window desks were first-come long before anybody wrote a rota down. Changing that is a bigger decision than the plan makes it look, and it is worth saying so out loud.
This person has already carried these words into the next round, word for word, so they stay as they are.
this person wroteThat is fair. Would you keep the rota at all, or drop it and hold the quiet hours instead?
This person put it to the research team as a question, with your words attached word for word. The next round picks the question up.
✓✓stands as a caveat at the pointnoteMove the calls to the small room
the small room is free most afternoons
The small room has one power socket and no window. Nobody takes an hour-long call in there twice.
This person has already carried these words into the next round, word for word, so they stay as they are.
the assistantNoted at the point. The plan says the room is free, and this says it is unusable for the thing it would be freed for; those are different claims and the second is not measured.
This stands as a caveat at the point, with your role beside it. The point itself and its grade do not change.
✓carried on in their own wordsquestion
Does any of this hold for the people who are not in the building on Mondays?
This person has already carried these words into the next round, word for word, so they stay as they are.
This person carried it on in their own words, in their own research.
◌stands where you wrote itnoteNobody measured the ventilation
Nobody has measured the ventilation, so I would not put a number on it in the plan at all.
A change is marked as edited and the version you are replacing is kept, so nothing you wrote is lost by changing it.
addressed to youquestionA rota for the window desks
You know the floor best: would a rota survive a week in practice, or is it a paper fix?
There is no counter of who read what. If this person replies to your words, or asks you something, it stands at the top of this page under New for you and waits there — nothing is mailed. What became of your comments you see at the comment itself, when you look.
What the host was asked to do
Both exits leave through a prop. Here they are accepted and recorded — nothing is published, nobody is notified, and the fixture round is where it was.