Coach · @orgdevkit/kit-money-coach
A conversation about the household’s own figures, where every number in the answer is one the product computed. A figure cites a reading by id and the kit hands back the reading, so a model cannot relabel one or change what it says — and a currency amount in the prose that no reading and no turn of the conversation accounts for refuses the whole reply. Every answer below goes through the real validator.
It makes one up appends sheet 12’s own second paragraph, verbatim: “That’s about €640 of the surplus for four months.” Nothing computed €640 — it is €2.550 ÷ 4 under a sentence that says so — so the reply is set aside. The refusal never repeats the figure: the whole point of refusing is that the number does not reach the person.
The Left to find card says computed in-app and contributes no name to the checked · … line, because you cannot check the product’s own arithmetic against a tool. And nothing wired answers the scope panel with a sentence rather than an empty row — neither drawing can, because both hard-code all eight chips.
Ask about our numbers
read-only · proposes, never edits- Net worth over timeget_networth_series
- Rungs and goal progressget_goal_progress
- The surplus equationget_surplus_breakdown
Individual payments, who they were paid to, and any account number: those never leave this product. It also does no arithmetic of its own — every figure it states was worked out here and can be opened on the screen it came from.
What are you weighing up?
It knows where you are on the ladder, what you are saving for, and this month’s numbers — ask the question the way you would say it out loud.